People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jones

27 A.D.2d 672, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4948

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 31, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 672 (People v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jones, 27 A.D.2d 672, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by respondent to resettle order of this court dated March 21, 1966 and for alternative relief. Motion granted as follows: The order of this court dated March 21, 1966 is resettled by striking from the decretal paragraph the words “ for a hearing and ” and adding thereto the following: “ In the event that said court decides that a hearing should be granted, the Justice there presiding may, if the parties stipulate therefor, direct that the hearing be held and determined in the Supreme Court, Queens Conuty, but that [673]*673the order to be made thereon be entered in the County Court, Westchester County; and that all further proceedings, if any be necessary, shall continue in the County Court, Westchester County.” Beldock, P. J., Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Babin, J., concurs, although he adheres to his dissenting vote and memorandum [25 A D 2d 675] on the March 21,1966 determination of the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondent to resettle order of this court dated March 21, 1966 and for alternative relief. Motion granted as follows: The order of this court dated March 21, 1966 is resettled by striking from the decretal paragraph the words “ for a hearing and ” and adding thereto the following: “ In the event that said court decides that a hearing should be granted, the Justice there presiding may, if the parties stipulate therefor, direct that the hearing be held and determined in the Supreme Court, Queens Conuty, but that [673]*673the order to be made thereon be entered in the County Court, Westchester County; and that all further proceedings, if any be necessary, shall continue in the County Court, Westchester County.” Beldock, P. J., Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Babin, J., concurs, although he adheres to his dissenting vote and memorandum [25 A D 2d 675] on the March 21,1966 determination of the appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 672, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jones-nyappdiv-1967.