People v. Jones

24 A.D.2d 564, 261 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3631

This text of 24 A.D.2d 564 (People v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Jones, 24 A.D.2d 564, 261 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

Judgment of conviction and sentence unanimously modified on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reducing the sentence to time already served and the judgment, as so modified, is affirmed. In view of defendant’s circumstances, the fact that the crime arose out of an accidental intervention without motive, and in view of the long time that has elapsed since the defendant’s last incarceration on this charge, it would be inhumane to require the defendant to resume service of the balance of his sentence. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.2d 564, 261 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jones-nyappdiv-1965.