People v. Jones
This text of 115 P. 1008 (People v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of the crime of rape, and upon judgment being pronounced took an appeal to this court. The cause was upon the calendar of this court for argument last September, and was then continued for the term. It was again called for argument on January 23d of this year. No argument was made on behalf of appellant, *Page 13 and there being no brief on file, appellant was given twenty days in which to file a brief.
No brief has since been filed, and no extension of time has been asked. We have nevertheless examined the record, but have discovered no reason why the judgment and order should not be affirmed.
The judgment and order are therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 P. 1008, 16 Cal. App. 12, 1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jones-calctapp-1911.