People v. Johnson

2023 NY Slip Op 00827
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 14, 2023
DocketInd No. 856/16 Appeal No. 17147 Case No. 2019-1843
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 00827 (People v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Johnson, 2023 NY Slip Op 00827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Johnson (2023 NY Slip Op 00827)
People v Johnson
2023 NY Slip Op 00827
Decided on February 14, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: February 14, 2023
Before: Kern, J.P., Oing, Gesmer, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, JJ.

Ind No. 856/16 Appeal No. 17147 Case No. 2019-1843

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Terrence Johnson Also Known as Terrance Johnson, Defendant-Appellant.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Nicolas Schumann-Ortega of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Stephanie L. Nelson of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Harold Adler, J. at suppression hearing; Robert E. Torres, J. at plea; Robert A. Neary, J. at sentencing), rendered November 9, 2018, convicting defendant of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545 [2019], cert denied 589 US —&mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]). The court's oral colloquy avoided conflating the right to appeal with the rights normally forfeited upon a guilty plea (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). The combination of the court's colloquy and the detailed written waiver that defendant signed after consultation

with counsel satisfied the requirements of a valid waiver. This waiver forecloses review of defendant's suppression claim. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: February 14, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Johnson
2023 NY Slip Op 00827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 00827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-johnson-nyappdiv-2023.