People v. Johnson
53 A.D.2d 589, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13235
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Motion for summary reversal denied, with leave to appellant, on presentation of the appeal, to set forth arguments showing that he was prejudiced by the absence of minutes of the prosecutor’s opening statement and the summations by both attorneys. (People v Fearon, 13 NY2d 59; People v Roundtree, 45 AD2d 731; People v Bronson, 35 AD2d 1068.) Efforts should also be made by both parties to reconstruct a transcript of the missing minutes. (See People v Rivera, 39 NY2d 519.) Concur— Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Johnson, 53 A.D.2d 589, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).
53 A.D.2d 589 (People v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Glass
372 N.E.2d 24 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)