People v. John

92 A.D.3d 896, 938 N.Y.2d 810

Opinion

Since the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a mandatory period of post-release supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]; People v Warren, 91 AD3d 800 [2012]; People v Ralph, 91 AD3d 796 [2012]; People v Mills, 90 AD3d 1076 [2011]; People v Louis, 90 AD3d 1075 [2011]; People v Edwards, 89 AD3d 1034 [2011]; People v Douglas, 89 AD3d 959 [2011]; People v Dawkins, 87 AD3d 550 [2011]; People v Guillen, 85 AD3d 1201 [2011]; People v Lopez, 85 AD3d 1059 [2011]; People v Myrick, 84 AD3d 1272 [2011]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Belen and Miller, JJ., concur.