People v. John
88 A.D.3d 491, 930 N.Y.2d 452
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. John. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 A.D.3d 709 →
Opinion
The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. [492]*492There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, including its resolution of any inconsistencies in testimony. The hearing evidence clearly established that the officer observed defendant in the act of picking the pocket of a sleeping victim. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Friedman, Catterson, Moskowitz and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. John, 88 A.D.3d 491, 930 N.Y.2d 452 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
88 A.D.3d 491 (People v. John) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.