People v. Jarvis
This text of 22 A.D.3d 865 (People v. Jarvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered October 23, 2003, convicting him of criminally negligent homicide, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of criminally negligent homicide is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of criminally negligent homicide beyond a reasonable doubt.
The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 A.D.3d 865, 802 N.Y.S.2d 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jarvis-nyappdiv-2005.