People v. James

59 A.D.3d 217, 874 N.Y.S.2d 24
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. James. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 A.D.3d 762

Opinion

[218]*218Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), rendered September 5, 2006, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree and attempted burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 3V2 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s application pursuant to Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79 [1986]). Immediately after the court mentioned the location of the crime, the panelist at issue spontaneously volunteered that she lived in that area. Although the panelist then assured the court that this would not be a problem, the prosecutor later explained that he challenged this panelist because she had initially volunteered her concern about her proximity to the crime and had been particularly vocal on the subject. The record supports the court’s finding that the nondiscriminatory reason provided by the prosecutor was not pretextual. This finding, which essentially involved an assessment of the prosecutor’s credibility, is entitled to great deference (see People v Hernandez, 75 NY2d 350 [1990], affd 500 US 352 [1991]). Concur—Tom, J.E, Saxe, McGuire, Moskowitz and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. James, 59 A.D.3d 217, 874 N.Y.S.2d 24 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

59 A.D.3d 217 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Hernandez v. New York
500 U.S. 352 (Supreme Court, 1991)
People v. Hernandez
552 N.E.2d 621 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)