People v. James

36 A.D.3d 630, 825 N.Y.S.2d 920
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 9, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 A.D.3d 630 (People v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. James, 36 A.D.3d 630, 825 N.Y.S.2d 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 20, 2005 (People v James, 19 AD3d 616 [2005]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 25, 2003.

[631]*631Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Schmidt, Ritter and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Jones v. Collado
2019 NY Slip Op 9076 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 A.D.3d 630, 825 N.Y.S.2d 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-james-nyappdiv-2007.