People v. James

207 A.D.2d 1028, 617 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10348
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Niagara County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Because the record does not establish whether defendant was present at the Sandoval conference, we reserve decision and remit the matter to Niagara County Court for a reconstruction hearing to expand the record and to determine whether defendant was present (see, People v Michalek, 82 NY2d 906; People v Odiat, 82 NY2d 872; People v Koberstein, 206 AD2d 928; People v Mitchell, 189 AD2d 337). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Den-man, P. J., Green, Fallon, Wesley and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. James, 207 A.D.2d 1028, 617 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

207 A.D.2d 1028 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. James
221 A.D.2d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Dulac
209 A.D.2d 1045 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)