People v. Dulac
This text of 209 A.D.2d 1045 (People v. Dulac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case held, decision [1046]*1046reserved and matter remitted to Niagara County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The People candidly concede that, because the record does not establish whether defendant was present at a Sandoval conference, the case must be remitted to Niagara County Court for a reconstruction hearing to expand the record and to determine whether defendant was present (see, People v Michalek, 82 NY2d 906; People v James, 207 AD2d 1028; People v Mitchell, 189 AD2d 337). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 A.D.2d 1045, 619 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dulac-nyappdiv-1994.