People v. Jacobsen

252 A.D.2d 507, 675 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8003
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jacobsen. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D.2d 951

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), rendered March 13, 1997, as amended April 1, 1998, convicting him of driving while under the influence of alcohol (two counts), violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1111 (d) (1), and violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1163 (b), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the results of his breathalyzer test should have been suppressed because there was insufficient evidence of calibration. This contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858, 859) and, in any event, is without merit (see, People v Freeland, 68 NY2d 699; People v Sherwood, 160 AD2d 1203).

Because the defendant was resentenced, his remaining contention is academic. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jacobsen, 252 A.D.2d 507, 675 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8003 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

252 A.D.2d 507 (People v. Jacobsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Freeland
497 N.E.2d 673 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Bynum
518 N.E.2d 4 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Sherwood
160 A.D.2d 1203 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)