People v. Jackson

2025 NY Slip Op 01898
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 2025
DocketInd. No. 834/18, 2000/19; Appeal No. 4018; Case No. 2021-03090
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 01898 (People v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Jackson, 2025 NY Slip Op 01898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Jackson (2025 NY Slip Op 01898)
People v Jackson
2025 NY Slip Op 01898
Decided on April 01, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 01, 2025
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., González, Shulman, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, JJ.

Ind. No. 834/18, 2000/19|Appeal No. 4018|Case No. 2021-03090|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Leonard Jackson, Defendant-Appellant.


Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Ben A. Schatz of counsel), and Latham & Watkins LLP, New York (Benjamin E. Harris of the bar of the State of California, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Matthew Colangelo of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Mandelbaum, J.), rendered August 12, 2021, as amended March 8, 2022, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, bribing a witness (two counts), intimidating a victim or witness in the third degree (two counts), tampering with a witness in the third degree, and criminal contempt in the second degree (two counts), and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

We perceive no basis for reducing defendant's sentence.

Since defendant's failed to obtain leave to appeal the denial of his CPL 440.10 motion to vacate judgment on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider his claim that leave should have been granted (CPL 460.15[1]; see People v Sorenson , 225 AD2d 566, 567 [2d Dept 1996], lv denied 88 NY2d 886 [1996], People v Harris , 107 AD2d 761, 762 [2d Dept 1985]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 1, 2025



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Harris
107 A.D.2d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Sorenson
225 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 01898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jackson-nyappdiv-2025.