People v. Isrile

64 A.D.2d 536, 406 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12283
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 11, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 64 A.D.2d 536 (People v. Isrile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Isrile, 64 A.D.2d 536, 406 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12283 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered December 16, 1976, convicting the defendant of assault in the second degree and sentencing him as a second felony offender to an indeterminate term of imprisonment from two to four years, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for a new trial. The defendant, among other things, was indicted for assault in the second degree (Penal Law, § 120.05, subd 2) for intentional assault with a dangerous weapon (knife). This was submitted' to the jury along with the lesser included offense of assault in the third degree (Penal Law, § 120.00, subd 1) being intentional assault. The jury convicted defendant of assault in the second degree and accordingly did not consider the lesser included offense of intentional assault in the third degree. The defendant had been drinking on and off all day before he stabbed the complainant after an argument over a $2 debt. Under the circumstances, even though defendant’s counsel did not request an instruction on intoxication, such an instruction was required in the interest of justice. (See People v Lee, 35 NY2d 826; People v Trisvan, 49 AD2d 913.) Further, there having been a request for the court to submit a charge as to "reckless” assault in the third degree (Penal Law, § 120.00, subd 2), it should not have been refused. Upon a reasonable view of the evidence, the jury could have found that the defendant committed this lesser offense. (See People v Greer, 42 NY2d 170, 173-174.) The possibility of intoxication could negative the element of intent (People v Orr, 43 AD2d 836, affd 35 NY2d 829), although the defendant may still have acted "recklessly”. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Birns, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Williams
212 A.D.2d 1065 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Stevenson
157 A.D.2d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Collins
86 A.D.2d 616 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Costello
73 A.D.2d 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 A.D.2d 536, 406 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-isrile-nyappdiv-1978.