People v. Lee

316 N.E.2d 715, 34 N.Y.2d 884, 359 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1439
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 27, 1974
StatusPublished

This text of 316 N.E.2d 715 (People v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lee, 316 N.E.2d 715, 34 N.Y.2d 884, 359 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1439 (N.Y. 1974).

Opinion

Memobandum. This defendant was convicted of perjury on the basis of a duly authenticated tape recording. IndMs situation section 210.50 of the Penal Law, providing that the “ falsity of a statement may not be established by the uncorroborated testimony of a single witness ” has no application. Nor is there any basis for a conclusion that the jury as a whole, as distinguished from the single objecting juror, was constrained to continue deliberating. We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
316 N.E.2d 715, 34 N.Y.2d 884, 359 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lee-ny-1974.