People v. Irvin
Opinion
By the Court,
William, the brother of the person last seised, if a citizen and capable of inheriting at the time of the decease of the intestate, would have taken the estate under § 8, of our statute of descents; and if dead leaving issue, also capable, they would like him have [130] taken under the same section. 1 R. S. 752, § 8. 7 Wendell, 336. But he is an alien and therefore cannot take, and his uninheritable blood impedes the descent to the naturalized son, the defendant. It is perfectly settled upon all the law, that the nephew does not inherit immediately or personally from the uncle; that he must derive title from the common stock, (the grandfather) through the blood of the father ; he stands in the second degree. 2 Black. Comm. 207, 227. 7 Wend. 332, and the cases there cited. 10 id. 9, and 6 Peters, 108.
The only remaining question then is, whether the defendant is brought within the statute, 1 R. S. 754, § 22, ameliorating the law in respect to heirs claiming through alien ancestors. It provides, that “ no person capable of inheriting under the provisions of this chapter, shall be precluded from such inheritance, by reason of the alienism of any ancestor of such person.” This section was taken, substantially from the 11 and 12 Wm. 3, ch. 6,
Judgment for plaintiff.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
21 Wend. 128 (People v. Irvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.