People v. Irlanda

2022 NY Slip Op 00735
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 3, 2022
DocketSCID No. 99016/20 Appeal No. 15227 Case No. 2020-04738
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2022 NY Slip Op 00735 (People v. Irlanda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Irlanda, 2022 NY Slip Op 00735 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Irlanda (2022 NY Slip Op 00735)
People v Irlanda
2022 NY Slip Op 00735
Decided on February 03, 2022
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: February 03, 2022
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Webber, Oing, Mendez, Higgitt, JJ.

SCID No. 99016/20 Appeal No. 15227 Case No. 2020-04738

[*1]The People of State of New York, Respondent,

v

Christopher Irlanda, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Benjamin Rutkin-Becker of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Morgan Namian of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about October 30, 2020, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the guidelines or were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying offense against a child, as well as defendant's extensive criminal history (see People v Ramos, 199 AD3d 423 [1st Dept 2021]). "Furthermore, defendant has provided little evidence of his claimed mitigating factors that would corroborate assertions by himself or his attorney" (id. at 424). Although defendant was subject to a lengthy period of probation, we do not find that to be a significant mitigating factor, particularly because defendant committed the underlying sex crime while he was already on probation from a prior conviction (see People v Lewis, 143 AD3d 604 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 916 [2017]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: February 3, 2022



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Irlanda
2022 NY Slip Op 00735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 NY Slip Op 00735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-irlanda-nyappdiv-2022.