People v. Irizarry

132 A.D.2d 478, 517 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49029
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Irizarry. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 A.D.2d 982

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fred W. Eggert, J.), rendered January 11, 1984, which, after a bench trial, convicted defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 6 to 12 years, is held in abeyance, with new counsel to be assigned for defendant and present counsel now relieved (People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833).

Defendant’s counsel, in purported compliance with Anders v California (386 US 738, reh denied 388 US 924) and People v Saunders (supra), has submitted a brief urging that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Defendant has responded by submitting a pro se brief on his own behalf, arguing that the People failed to disprove his agency defense in this narcotics sale transaction beyond a reasonable doubt. We find the merit of this contention sufficiently colorable to warrant its presentation by "an active advocate in behalf of his client” (Anders v California, supra, at 744) and direct that the appeal go forward accordingly (see, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Concur—Sandler, J. P., Carro, Kassal, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Irizarry, 132 A.D.2d 478, 517 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49029 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

132 A.D.2d 478 (People v. Irizarry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Saunders
52 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)