People v. Irizarry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Irizarry

141 A.D.2d 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6549

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 141 A.D.2d 666 (People v. Irizarry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Irizarry, 141 A.D.2d 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6549 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.), rendered October 23, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the People, was legally sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit (see, People v Rivera, 137 AD2d 634; People v Berrios, 138 AD2d 725). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.), rendered October 23, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the People, was legally sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit (see, People v Rivera, 137 AD2d 634; People v Berrios, 138 AD2d 725). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 A.D.2d 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-irizarry-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack