People v. Ingram
773 N.W.2d 676, 485 Mich. 927
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ingram. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 904 →
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roummel Jerome INGRAM, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to withdraw plea, the motion for remand to the trial court, and the motion for appointment of counsel are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Ingram, 773 N.W.2d 676, 485 Mich. 927 (Mich. 2009).
773 N.W.2d 676 (People v. Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.