People v. Ingram

Michigan Supreme Court

People v. Ingram

746 N.W.2d 68, 480 Mich. 1138

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ingram. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 904 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 24, 2008·No. 135623·Published

Opinion

746 N.W.2d 68 (2008)

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roummel Jerome INGRAM, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 135623. COA No. 273086.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 24, 2008.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions to remand to the trial court and for relief from judgment by default are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

746 N.W.2d 68 (2008)

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roummel Jerome INGRAM, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 135623. COA No. 273086.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 24, 2008.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions to remand to the trial court and for relief from judgment by default are DENIED.

People v. Ingram, 746 N.W.2d 68, 480 Mich. 1138 (Mich. 2008).

Pincite

746 N.W.2d 68 (People v. Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roummel Jerome INGRAM, Defendant-Appellant.

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roummel Jerome INGRAM, Defendant-Appellant.