People v. Hurley
This text of 47 A.D.3d 488 (People v. Hurley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.), entered on or about October 17, 2005, which denied defendant’s motion for a subpoena duces tecum, unanimously dismissed as taken from a nonappealable order.
Since defendant filed his motion in Supreme Court, Criminal Term and the motion was related to his completed criminal action (a conviction in 1989), the order arose out of a criminal proceeding (see CPL 1.20 [18] [b]), and “no appeal lies from an order arising out of a criminal proceeding absent specific statutory authorization” (People v Santos, 64 NY2d 702, 704 [1984]; see also People v Stevens, 91 NY2d 270, 277 [1998]). Nothing in CPL article 450 authorizes an appeal from an order denying a motion for a subpoena duces tecum. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 A.D.3d 488, 848 N.Y.S.2d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hurley-nyappdiv-2008.