Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Hunter

People v. Hunter

281 A.D.2d 964, 722 N.Y.S.2d 444, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2907
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 21, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 281 A.D.2d 964 (People v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hunter, 281 A.D.2d 964, 722 N.Y.S.2d 444, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although defendant’s factual recitation during the plea allocution raised the possibility of the defense of intoxication, County Court conducted the requisite further inquiry with respect to that possible defense (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666). We conclude that the plea was voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered (see, People v Harrell, 278 AD2d 852). (Appeal from Judgment of Livingston County Court, Alonzo, J. — Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hayes, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. McGrail
42 A.D.3d 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Zodarecky
15 A.D.3d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D.2d 964, 722 N.Y.S.2d 444, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hunter-nyappdiv-2001.