People v. Hunter

281 A.D.2d 964, 722 N.Y.S.2d 444, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2907
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although defendant’s factual recitation during the plea allocution raised the possibility of the defense of intoxication, County Court conducted the requisite further inquiry with respect to that possible defense (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666). We conclude that the plea was voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered (see, People v Harrell, 278 AD2d 852). (Appeal from Judgment of Livingston County Court, Alonzo, J. — Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hayes, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hunter, 281 A.D.2d 964, 722 N.Y.S.2d 444, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 964 (People v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. McGrail
42 A.D.3d 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Zodarecky
15 A.D.3d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)