People v. Harrell

270 A.D.2d 358, 704 N.Y.S.2d 869, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2780
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.), rendered October 7, 1998, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree, sodomy in the second degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the prosecutor’s conduct on summation was improper in that she appealed to the sympathy of the jury, made inflammatory remarks, and attempted to shift the burden of proof. Although some portions of the prosecutor’s summation may have been improper, given the overwhelming proof of guilt, any error was harmless (see, People v Brosnan, 32 NY2d 254, 262; People v Nazario, 168 AD2d 643). Joy, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harrell, 270 A.D.2d 358, 704 N.Y.S.2d 869, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 358 (People v. Harrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Tucker
27 A.D.3d 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Horne
6 A.D.3d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Ivory
307 A.D.2d 1000 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)