People v. Huddleston

62 A.D.3d 494, 877 N.Y.S.2d 898

This text of 62 A.D.3d 494 (People v. Huddleston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Huddleston, 62 A.D.3d 494, 877 N.Y.S.2d 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, (Robert M. Stolz, J.), rendered November 27, 2007, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender, to a term of 8V2 years, unanimously affirmed.

Although we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence, defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid. The record reflects that discussion about waiver of appellate rights first occurred after the plea proceeding and completion of a predicate felony determination. It was never explained to defendant that, as a condition of the plea, he was waiving his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Ramos, 152 AD2d 209 [1989]).

Motion seeking leave to file a supplemental pro se brief and related relief denied. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Moskowitz and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Ramos
152 A.D.2d 209 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 A.D.3d 494, 877 N.Y.S.2d 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-huddleston-nyappdiv-2009.