People v. Howard

270 A.D.2d 179, 705 N.Y.S.2d 224, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3318
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Howard. Read the opinion of the Court — 241 A.D.2d 920

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered October 30, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The totality of defen[180]*180dant’s statements and conduct during the drug transaction provided ample basis for a reasonable inference of accessorial liability. Specifically, the evidence established that defendant’s participation included, inter alia, an unsuccessful attempt to determine whether the prospective purchaser was an undercover officer by offering to sell him imitation drugs. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Howard, 270 A.D.2d 179, 705 N.Y.S.2d 224, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3318 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 179 (People v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.