People v. Howard

246 A.D.2d 307, 666 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Howard. Read the opinion of the Court — 213 A.D.2d 903

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Sudolnik, J.), rendered July 9, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. There was ample evidence, including defendant’s salesmanlike conduct before and after the sale, to establish that defendant intentionally participated in the sale rather than that he merely advised the undercover officer where drugs could be purchased (see, People v Rivera, 241 AD2d 305). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Howard, 246 A.D.2d 307, 666 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

246 A.D.2d 307 (People v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rivera
241 A.D.2d 305 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)