People v. Hoover

442 N.E.2d 1267, 57 N.Y.2d 908, 456 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3777
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 1982·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed and a new trial ordered. The trial court erred in permitting the prosecution to elicit testimony regarding defendant’s statements in that the prosecution was duty bound to inform the defense of the existence of those statements, which in effect were used as direct evidence of guilt (People v Ricco, 56 NY2d 320), pursuant to CPL 710.30 (People v Briggs, 38 NY2d 319).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hoover, 442 N.E.2d 1267, 57 N.Y.2d 908, 456 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3777 (N.Y. 1982).

442 N.E.2d 1267 (People v. Hoover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Schiavi
475 N.E.2d 121 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Valle
121 Misc. 2d 621 (New York County Courts, 1983)