People v. Hoover

442 N.E.2d 1267, 57 N.Y.2d 908, 456 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3777
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 19, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 442 N.E.2d 1267 (People v. Hoover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hoover, 442 N.E.2d 1267, 57 N.Y.2d 908, 456 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3777 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed and a new trial ordered. The trial court erred in permitting the prosecution to elicit testimony regarding defendant’s statements in that the prosecution was duty bound to inform the defense of the existence of those statements, which in effect were used as direct evidence of guilt (People v Ricco, 56 NY2d 320), pursuant to CPL 710.30 (People v Briggs, 38 NY2d 319).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Schiavi
475 N.E.2d 121 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Valle
121 Misc. 2d 621 (New York County Courts, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
442 N.E.2d 1267, 57 N.Y.2d 908, 456 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hoover-ny-1982.