People v. Hood

180 A.D.2d 752

This text of 180 A.D.2d 752 (People v. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hood, 180 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Beldock, J.), entered February 27, 1987, which denied his motion pursuant to CPL article 440 to vacate a judgment of conviction of the same court rendered June 14, 1978.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The defendant’s judgment of conviction was affirmed by this court (People v Hood, 96 AD2d 1152, affd 62 NY2d 863). The defendant’s sole contention on this appeal from the denial of his motion to vacate the judgment of conviction is that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel. The proper procedure for addressing such a claim, however, is through an application for writ of error coram nobis addressed to this court (see, People v Bachert, 69 NY2d 593). We have considered and denied the defendant’s application for a writ of error of coram nobis (People v Hood, 180 AD2d 751 [decided herewith]). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hood
466 N.E.2d 161 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Bachert
509 N.E.2d 318 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Hood
180 A.D.2d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 A.D.2d 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hood-nyappdiv-1992.