People v. Holzer

419 N.E.2d 867, 52 N.Y.2d 947, 437 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2198
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 12, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 419 N.E.2d 867 (People v. Holzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Holzer, 419 N.E.2d 867, 52 N.Y.2d 947, 437 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2198 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

[948]*948OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was convicted of seven counts of grand lar- ’ ceny in the second degree in consequence of her operation of a so-called “Ponzi scheme” involving proposed investment of moneys belonging to her victims in Spanish real estate and the importation of automobiles, trucks and parts into Indonesia. Defendant predicates her arguments for reversal of her convictions on alleged errors in the court’s charge to the jury. Principally she argues that it was error on the part of the trial court in submitting the charges of larceny not to have charged in accordance with what she asserts is the command of the second sentence of the second grammatical paragraph of section 155.05 (subd 2, par [d]) of the Penal Law. In consequence of the failure of her counsel either to make a request for the desired charge or to except to the court’s failure so to charge the issue has not been preserved for our review.

We have examined defendant’s other contentions and conclude either that, in consequence of failure to register timely protest, they were not preserved or that they are without merit.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Powell
115 A.D.3d 998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Henehan
111 A.D.3d 1151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Hawkins
110 A.D.3d 1242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Pettus
22 A.D.3d 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Collins
780 N.E.2d 499 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
People v. Douglas
296 A.D.2d 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Webster
290 A.D.2d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Lugo v. Kuhlmann
68 F. Supp. 2d 347 (S.D. New York, 1999)
Avincola v. Stinson
60 F. Supp. 2d 133 (S.D. New York, 1999)
People v. Morris
245 A.D.2d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Gilchrist
239 A.D.2d 306 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Vasquez
221 A.D.2d 575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Reese
167 A.D.2d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Williams
167 A.D.2d 565 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Jones
167 A.D.2d 182 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Dawson
166 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Mouzon
154 A.D.2d 626 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Duffy
152 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Udzinski
146 A.D.2d 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Martinez
144 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
419 N.E.2d 867, 52 N.Y.2d 947, 437 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holzer-ny-1981.