People v. Holmes

95 A.D.3d 1236, 943 N.Y.S.2d 906
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 23, 2012·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (J. Doyle, J.), imposed June 29, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Wright, 89 AD3d 874, 874-875 [2011]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, A.P.J., Balkin, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Holmes, 95 A.D.3d 1236, 943 N.Y.S.2d 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

95 A.D.3d 1236 (People v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Norfort
101 A.D.3d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Winslow
100 A.D.3d 1031 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)