People v. Norfort
101 A.D.3d 756, 954 N.Y.2d 499
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 5, 2012
StatusPublished
This text of 101 A.D.3d 756 (People v. Norfort) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Norfort, 101 A.D.3d 756, 954 N.Y.2d 499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
Opinion
Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Holmes, 95 AD3d 1236 [2012]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Leventhal, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Holmes
95 A.D.3d 1236 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
101 A.D.3d 756, 954 N.Y.2d 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-norfort-nyappdiv-2012.