People v. Holmes & Caswell

2 Wend. 281
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1829·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Savage, C. J.

The bond of a constable may be given to the people, though it is not deemed necessary ^at jj. te thus executed, as intimated in Warner v. Racey, (20 Johns. R. 74.) Any person to whom the constable has become responsible on account of an execution delivered to him for collection, is entitled to commence a suit on the bond or instrument in writing, (in the language of the statute,) executed by him to ensure the faithful discharge of his duties, and previous leave to prosecute is not necessary to be obtained. The motion is denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Holmes & Caswell, 2 Wend. 281 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

2 Wend. 281 (People v. Holmes & Caswell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Levin v. Robie
5 Misc. 529 (Superior Court of Buffalo, 1893)
Walton v. Jones
7 Utah 462 (Utah Supreme Court, 1891)
Taylor v. Parker
43 Wis. 78 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1877)
State Ex Rel. Morris v. Clymer
8 Del. 20 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1864)
Village of Warren v. Philips
30 Barb. 646 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Mayor of New York v. Doody
4 Abb. Pr. 127 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1856)
Lawton v. Erwin
9 Wend. 233 (New York Supreme Court, 1832)
People v. Holmes
5 Wend. 191 (New York Supreme Court, 1830)