People v. Holman
594 N.E.2d 928, 79 N.Y.2d 986, 584 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1245
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. The record establishes that, in considering defendant’s Sandoval motion, the Trial Judge balanced the probative worth of the evidence against the risk of unfair prejudice to the defendant in accordance with People v Sandoval (34 NY2d 371).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Kaye, Titone, *988 Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Yesawich, Jr. * Taking no part: Judge Simons.
*
Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Holman, 594 N.E.2d 928, 79 N.Y.2d 986, 584 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1245 (N.Y. 1992).
594 N.E.2d 928 (People v. Holman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Greene v. Gerber Products Co.
262 F. Supp. 3d 38 (E.D. New York, 2017)
Marini v. Adamo
995 F. Supp. 2d 155 (E.D. New York, 2014)
People v. Cabassa
186 Misc. 2d 200 (New York Supreme Court, 2000)
People v. Chandler
266 A.D.2d 874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Wiggins
227 A.D.2d 918 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)