Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Holman

People v. Holman

594 N.E.2d 928, 79 N.Y.2d 986, 584 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1245
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 30, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 594 N.E.2d 928 (People v. Holman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Holman, 594 N.E.2d 928, 79 N.Y.2d 986, 584 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1245 (N.Y. 1992).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. The record establishes that, in considering defendant’s Sandoval motion, the Trial Judge balanced the probative worth of the evidence against the risk of unfair prejudice to the defendant in accordance with People v Sandoval (34 NY2d 371).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Kaye, Titone, *988 Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Yesawich, Jr. * Taking no part: Judge Simons.

*

Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greene v. Gerber Products Co.
262 F. Supp. 3d 38 (E.D. New York, 2017)
Marini v. Adamo
995 F. Supp. 2d 155 (E.D. New York, 2014)
People v. Cabassa
186 Misc. 2d 200 (New York Supreme Court, 2000)
People v. Chandler
266 A.D.2d 874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Wiggins
227 A.D.2d 918 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
594 N.E.2d 928, 79 N.Y.2d 986, 584 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holman-ny-1992.