People v. Hinton

233 A.D.2d 464, 650 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11929
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hinton. Read the opinion of the Court — 252 A.D.2d 428

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered July 11, 1994, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, resisting arrest, and menacing in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Many of the defendant’s claims that statements by the prosecutor during summation constitute reversible error are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 250). While some of the alleged errors which are preserved for appellate review pertain to comments which would have been better left unsaid, reversal is not warranted under the circumstances of this case (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 242). Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hinton, 233 A.D.2d 464, 650 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

233 A.D.2d 464 (People v. Hinton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Udzinski
146 A.D.2d 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)