People v. Hill

2021 NY Slip Op 02666, 143 N.Y.S.3d 240, 193 A.D.3d 1366
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 125 N.Y.S.3d 599
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 30, 2021·No. 437 KA 18-00511·Published

Opinion

People v Hill (2021 NY Slip Op 02666)
People v Hill
2021 NY Slip Op 02666
Decided on April 30, 2021
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 30, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

437 KA 18-00511

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

JAQUAN HILL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (JANE I. YOON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Orleans County Court (Sara Sheldon, A.J.), rendered January 8, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a guilty plea of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 205.25 [1]). As an initial matter, we agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565-566 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; People v Biaselli, 191 AD3d 1400, 1401 [4th Dept 2021]; People v Wasyl, 186 AD3d 1071, 1071 [4th Dept 2020]; People v Baxter, 185 AD3d 1452, 1452 [4th Dept 2020], lv denied 35 NY3d 1092 [2020]). Contrary to defendant's contention, the investigator's statements prior to issuing the Miranda warnings did not vitiate or neutralize the effect of the warnings (cf. People v Dunbar, 24 NY3d 304, 315-316 [2014], cert denied 575 US 1005 [2015]), and therefore County Court did not err in refusing to suppress defendant's statements to the investigator (see People v Box, 181 AD3d 1238, 1239 [4th Dept 2020], lv denied 35 NY3d 1025 [2020], cert denied — US &mdash, 141 S Ct 1099 [2021]; People v Jemes, 132 AD3d 1361, 1362 [4th Dept 2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 1110 [2016]).

Entered: April 30, 2021

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hill, 2021 NY Slip Op 02666, 143 N.Y.S.3d 240, 193 A.D.3d 1366 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

2021 NY Slip Op 02666 (People v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Box
2020 NY Slip Op 1813 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Baxter
2020 NY Slip Op 4081 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Wasyl
2020 NY Slip Op 4675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Biaselli
2021 NY Slip Op 00770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Dunbar
23 N.E.3d 946 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)