People v. Baxter
This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 4081 (People v. Baxter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Baxter |
| 2020 NY Slip Op 04081 |
| Decided on July 17, 2020 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on July 17, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, WINSLOW, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
683 KA 19-01306
v
DEMETRIUS M. BAXTER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
NICHOLAS B. ROBINSON, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (JOSEPH G. FRAZIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
CAROLINE A. WOJTASZEK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara Sheldon, J.), rendered May 20, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.10 [2] [b]). Preliminarily, we agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (see People v Cole, 181 AD3d 1329, 1330 [4th Dept 2020]). Nevertheless, defendant's contention that County Court failed to conduct a sufficient inquiry before terminating his interim probation is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Alsaaidi, 173 AD3d 1836, 1837 [4th Dept 2019], lv denied 35 NY3d 940 [2020]; People v Wissert, 85 AD3d 1633, 1633-1634 [4th Dept 2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 956 [2011]), and we decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]). Contrary to defendant's further contention, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: July 17, 2020
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 NY Slip Op 4081, 125 N.Y.S.3d 600, 185 A.D.3d 1452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-baxter-nyappdiv-2020.