People v. Hill

30 A.D.3d 209, 816 N.Y.S.2d 466
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 A.D.3d 715

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J.), rendered [210]*210December 23, 2003, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of two years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, which forecloses review of his present claim that he should have received youthful offender treatment (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]). In any event, were we to find that defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal, we would find that the court properly exercised its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment. Concur—Tom, J.E, Saxe, Friedman, Sullivan and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hill, 30 A.D.3d 209, 816 N.Y.S.2d 466 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

30 A.D.3d 209 (People v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)