People v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hill

16 A.D.3d 229, 790 N.Y.S.2d 604, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2682

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 A.D.3d 229 (People v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hill, 16 A.D.3d 229, 790 N.Y.S.2d 604, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J., at hearing; William A. Wetzel, J, at plea and sentence), rendered September 15, 1999, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of six years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his suppression claim, including interest of justice review (People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9-10 [1989]; People v Graham, 220 AD2d 215 [1995], lv denied 87 NY2d 1019 [1996]). In any event, were we to find that defendant did not make a valid waiver, we would reject his suppression arguments. Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Ellerin and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J., at hearing; William A. Wetzel, J, at plea and sentence), rendered September 15, 1999, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of six years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his suppression claim, including interest of justice review (People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9-10 [1989]; People v Graham, 220 AD2d 215 [1995], lv denied 87 NY2d 1019 [1996]). In any event, were we to find that defendant did not make a valid waiver, we would reject his suppression arguments. Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Ellerin and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.3d 229, 790 N.Y.S.2d 604, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hill-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack