People v. Hicks

152 A.D.2d 932, 544 N.Y.S.2d 740, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9792
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hicks. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 A.D.2d 519

Opinion

Case held, decision reserved, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court erred in summarily denying defendant’s motion to suppress tangible evidence seized from him during a border search. Because no hearing was conducted, the record is insufficient to allow us to determine whether there was "some” suspicion justifying the "pocket search” conducted by Customs officials (People v Luna, 73 NY2d 173, 178-180). Therefore, we hold the case and remit for a hearing to determine defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.— criminal possession of stolen property, second degree.) Present —Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hicks, 152 A.D.2d 932, 544 N.Y.S.2d 740, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

152 A.D.2d 932 (People v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Luna
535 N.E.2d 1305 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)