People v. Hicks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hicks

128 A.D.2d 637, 512 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44330

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 9, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 128 A.D.2d 637 (People v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hicks, 128 A.D.2d 637, 512 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), rendered August 19, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the People, the evidence was more than sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction of the crimes charged. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the evidence was of sufficient quality and quantity to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have considered the defendant’s other contentions and have found them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), rendered August 19, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the People, the evidence was more than sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction of the crimes charged. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the evidence was of sufficient quality and quantity to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have considered the defendant’s other contentions and have found them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 A.D.2d 637, 512 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hicks-nyappdiv-1987.