People v. Hernandez

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Hernandez

600 N.E.2d 230, 80 N.Y.2d 872, 587 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1613

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 7, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 600 N.E.2d 230 (People v. Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hernandez, 600 N.E.2d 230, 80 N.Y.2d 872, 587 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1613 (N.Y. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that the People exercised their peremptory challenges in a racially discriminatory manner is baseless (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79). The courts below properly concluded that defendant failed to make out a prima facie showing that the prosecution purposefully excluded members of his race from the jury (id., at 96; see, People v Bolling, 79 NY2d 317).

We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI