People v. Hernandez CA4/2
This text of People v. Hernandez CA4/2 (People v. Hernandez CA4/2) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 1/3/24 P. v. Hernandez CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E081830
v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF153872)
JOSEPH HERNANDEZ, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. John D. Molloy, Judge.
Dismissed.
David L. Polsky, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
1 INTRODUCTION
Defendant Joseph Hernandez appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for
resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. Counsel filed a brief raising no arguable
issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 (Delgadillo).
On November 3, 2023, we notified defendant: (1) counsel filed a brief indicating
no arguable issues had been identified; (2) as a case arising from an order denying
postconviction relief, this court was not required to conduct an independent review of the
record, but we could do so in our discretion; and (3) in accordance with the procedures
set forth in Delgadillo, he had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief raising any
argument he wanted this court to consider. We also notified defendant that if we did not
receive a brief within that 30-day period, we may dismiss the appeal as abandoned. More
than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. We
consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed. (Delgadillo,
supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)
2 DISPOSITION
The appeal is dismissed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
FIELDS J. We concur:
McKINSTER Acting P.J.
CODRINGTON J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People v. Hernandez CA4/2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hernandez-ca42-calctapp-2024.