People v. Herbison

242 N.E.2d 394, 22 N.Y.2d 946
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 1968·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

22 N.Y.2d 946 (1968)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
George W. Herbison, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 7, 1968.
Decided October 16, 1968.

Leon Kesner and James D. Saver for appellant.

George J. Aspland, District Attorney (Thomas J. Klei of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN.

Judgment reversed and information dismissed. There was no probable cause for the arrest of defendant. His confession immediately followed this unlawful arrest, and must be considered inadmissible under the facts of this case. Had the confession been admissible, defendant's culpability could have been deemed established by entry into the premises by his accomplices (former Penal Law, § 2, defining "principal"; People v. Katz, 209 N.Y. 311, 325-326; People v. Henry, 18 A D 2d 293). The People admit the insufficiency of their case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Herbison, 242 N.E.2d 394, 22 N.Y.2d 946 (N.Y. 1968).

242 N.E.2d 394 (People v. Herbison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lewis
105 A.D.2d 758 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Valerio
64 A.D.2d 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
People v. Anderson
364 N.E.2d 1318 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)