People v. Hayes

276 A.D.2d 805, 716 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10963
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hayes. Read the opinion of the Court — 261 A.D.2d 872

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (LaPera, J.), rendered February 17, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. Viewed in totality, the trial record reveals that he was provided meaningful representation (see, People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 186; People v Jackson, 70 NY2d 768, 769; People v Badia, 159 AD2d 577, 578; People v Sullivan, 153 AD2d 223).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, and in any event, without merit. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hayes, 276 A.D.2d 805, 716 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10963 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 805 (People v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Flores
639 N.E.2d 19 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Jackson
514 N.E.2d 1369 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Sullivan
153 A.D.2d 223 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Badia
159 A.D.2d 577 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)