People v. Hayes

249 A.D.2d 995, 671 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5172
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hayes. Read the opinion of the Court — 226 A.D.2d 1055

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]). The evidence is legally sufficient to support the verdict (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Wisner and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hayes, 249 A.D.2d 995, 671 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

249 A.D.2d 995 (People v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)