People v. Hayes
This text of 223 A.D.2d 602 (People v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered February 1, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree and attempted murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court acted properly in refusing to charge the jury on the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance (see, Penal Law § 125.25 [1] [a]). No reasonable view of the evidence supported a conclusion that the defendant, who concededly had a protracted history of disputes with the two victims, acted under the influence of extreme emotional disturbance when, while conversing with them in their car, he shot them (see, People v White, 79 NY2d 900; People v Hairston, 208 AD2d 765; People v Murden, 190 AD2d 822).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
223 A.D.2d 602, 636 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hayes-nyappdiv-1996.