People v. Hayes

186 A.D.2d 1044, 590 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11644
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly exercised its discretion in admitting into evidence the prior sworn statements of a prosecution witness as past recollection recorded [1045]*1045(see, People v Dillenbeck, 115 AD2d 331; People v Raja, 77 AD2d 322, 325-326). We conclude that defendant’s conviction of murder in the second degree was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present— Green, J. P., Lawton, Boehm, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hayes, 186 A.D.2d 1044, 590 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

186 A.D.2d 1044 (People v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hayes
284 A.D.2d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)