Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Dillenbeck

People v. Dillenbeck

112 A.D.2d 784, 492 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56023
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 12, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D.2d 784 (People v. Dillenbeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Dillenbeck, 112 A.D.2d 784, 492 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with the trial court that, under the circumstances of this case, the prior statement allegedly made by the victim cannot reasonably be construed as being inconsistent with her testimony. In any event, if the exclusion of this statement was error, it was harmless (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).

We find no merit to the other issues raised by defendant. (Appeal from judgment of Herkimer County Court, Bergin, J. —attempted murder, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 A.D.2d 784, 492 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dillenbeck-nyappdiv-1985.